Julie & Julia

0

all_rating

Julie & Julia
swan_humdrum
Runtime: 123 Minutes
OK for Children

Meryl Streep in Sony Pictures’ “Julie & Julia” (2009).

Meryl Streep in Sony Pictures’ “Julie & Julia” (2009).

I can’t say this is entirely worthless. There is a scene at about the 1:37 mark between Amy Adams and Mary Lynn Rajskub that I enjoyed.
The producers clearly knew that there was no cinematic story to tell about Julia Child (Meryl Streep). She was a very tall television cook with a funny sounding voice. What’s to tell?
So they combined her story (from her book) with the story of Julie Powell (Adams), from her book, a bored housewife who, to liven up her life, committed to cooking all 524 recipes in Child’s book within one year and blogged about it on the internet. The Powell segment was filmed first, then the Child segment, and then the two were combined in the cutting room.
I loved “Heartburn,” writer-director Nora Ephron’s 1983 autobiographical novel about her marriage and breakup with goofy, egotistical journalist Carl Bernstein. The big charm about “Heartburn” is that you’re reading along and suddenly, boom! She inserts a recipe out of the blue, and then goes right along with her story. I still make my cheesecake out of her recipe and people never fail to rave about it. I liked “When Harry Met Sally” (1989), but was that due to her script or Rob Reiner’s directing? In this one she directs her own screenplay and it is an ordeal to endure, despite pictures of mouth-watering dishes, and some nice shots of Paris in the ‘50s.
As for Meryl Streep, she had a tough decision to make. I think actors make a big mistake when they try to precisely duplicate someone’s voice and mannerisms when portraying them in a movie. The performance of someone playing a real person in a biopic against which I weigh all others is that of Larry Parks in “The Jolson Story” (1946). Parks didn’t try to speak as Jolie spoke, and he lip synced to Jolie’s real voice for the songs. Otherwise, he played it straight up, interpreting Jolson as a man, not trying to mimic him. To me, that’s the most effective way to play someone in a biopic.
When they give way to the urge to mimic the person, they risk appearing as a parody of that person. Jamie Foxx as Ray Charles was probably the only actor who did try to mimic and got away with it. Watching Foxx in that movie, I felt as if I were watching Charles. But in this film, Streep’s performance is little more than a caricature, and a bad one, at that. I cringed every time she was on the screen. I was constantly aware that she was “acting,” which is a kiss of death.
Adams does her best to bring the movie to life. She is a brilliant actress, even with a script like this. One is almost never aware that she is acting (I say “almost” because there is one scene where she is clearly acting, see below). Her talent is such that she is already close to being a national treasure.
To say that Ephron’s script and direction are disappointing would be giving them too much praise. (Spoiler alert). During the course of the film, Julie’s wussy husband, Eric (Chris Messina), walks out on her. Ephron didn’t set this up right, because I thought he just went out to the store. Even though Julie recognizes that she’s being abandoned, she really doesn’t take it that hard. Oh, she’s upset, but not as devastated as the way I would imagine someone would be if the spouse they adored really did walk out. This unemotional response to a breakup has been a problem in other Ephron movies. Maybe Nora was so relieved to get away from Bernstein (which would certainly be understandable just from seeing him parade himself around on TV like a peacock) that she thinks everybody takes being dumped with such sanguinity. Not.
In addition to innumerable scenes of cooking and food, there are lots of scenes that just don’t work. Maybe the worst is the one with Julie and Eric in bed watching Dan Akroyd play Julia on Saturday Night Live (Streep’s Julia reminded me more of Akroyd’s Julia than Julia’s Julia). Julie and Eric laugh uncontrollably but unconvincingly. They were about as convincing as the hired shills planted in the audience at my screening, a sure sign the studio is worried about a film. There is also a chronology problem here. Julie and Eric are watching this in the early 2000s. But Akroyd’s skit about Child appeared on SNL in December of 1978 when Julie and Eric were infants, at best.
So maybe this is just a chick flick. It’s certainly catty enough to qualify. Ephron pictures Irma Rombauer (Frances Sternhagen), the author of the timeless “Joy of Cooking,” as confessing to Julia that she didn’t try out her recipes before publishing them. Maybe that’s true, but it’s hard to believe that she would admit it, especially to a competitor. At the end of the film Nora takes a shot at Julia herself.
For Columbia Pictures’ sake, I hope that it will appeal to women because not too many guys are going to be able to sit through this too-long epic without being paid to laugh or to write a review. I was very disappointed because I was looking forward to it.

Share.

About Author

At the Movies

Comments are closed.