The Wolf of Wall Street

0

all_rating

The Wolf of Wall Street
swan_enjoyable
Runtime 180 minutes.
Not for children.

Leonardo DiCaprio in “The Wolf of Wall Street.”

Leonardo DiCaprio in “The Wolf of Wall Street.”

The weakness of our capitalistic system isn’t in the means of production. The main weakness is in professional services, where there is almost always a built-in conflict of interest. The most morally corrupt in our society is without question the legal profession where lawyers’ primary interest in billing as many hours as possible is clearly in conflict with their obligation to do good for their clients.

But the horrible moral compass created by this conflict of interest isn’t limited to lawyers. All providers of personal services have to compromise between maximizing profit and doing what is best for the client. Stock brokers are probably as close to lawyers as being the low people on the totem pole as any other personal service.

Finally here comes a film that castigates the lack of integrity of the stock brokerage profession and calls a spade a spade. While there are good, moral stock brokers, just as there are good, moral lawyers (somewhere; just don’t ask me where they are) there are many more who are in it for what they can get out of it, not to do good for the client.

This presents a moral and ethical roadblock that is almost impossible to surmount. Many, if not most, stock brokers don’t know what is a good stock investment and what isn’t. If they were that smart they’d be investing for themselves and not just working to live off the commissions they receive on trades. What a stock broker wants to do is get the highest commission on his trades, forget whether or not the trade ends up being profitable for the client, and to “churn,” make as many trades as possible. As a result he recommends any stock for which he can come up with a plausible reason to buy, whether it’s accurate or not.

That’s what this movie exposes. Leonardo DiCaprio plays Jordan Belfort, a real life person who told his story in a frank memoir that director Martin Scorsese has made into a movie, seeming to go overboard in showing the moral corruption, not just in the broker-client relationship, but in all things, as Jordan and his fellow brokers wallow in drugs, exorbitant spending, rampant infidelity, and sexual excess. Jordan is a salesman who doesn’t have a clue about what is or what is not a good investment. But he does know where the money is after he’s advised what the game is at the outset by Matthew McConaughey. In essence, he’s told to get the money for himself, as much as he can and as fast as he can at the expense of gullible investors who know less about investing than Jordan does. Jordan learns this lesson well, establishes a stock brokerage full of brokers with no sense of ethics trading penny stocks, and makes an obscene fortune for himself and his brokers.

This film at times brings to mind such movieland bacchanalia and orgiastic rites as Gore Vidal’s Caligula (1979) that contained rampant nudity and graphic sexual acts. Scorsese stops short of making this a hard core pornographic film, but there is abundant nudity including multiple scenes of people simulating sex. Is watching Leonardo DiCaprio simulating innumerable graphic sexual acts entertaining? Not to me. But Scorsese submits his audience to this time and again.

I said that Scorsese “seems to go overboard” but apparently this is the way it was. It’s hard to believe that people really acted (or still act) this way, but apparently Scorsese is just showing Jordan’s life as he and his cohorts lived it.

But the biggest weakness of the film is that it totally ignores the clients who are taken to the cleaners by these unethical brokers. People lose real money and lots of people lost a lot of real money to these people, but Scorsese and DiCaprio apparently don’t think they are important enough to even mention. We don’t even see as much as one person who invested money with these creeps and lost it all! In three hours Scorsese couldn’t find the time to show the effects of what these brokers did on the innocent victims? That’s inexcusable and superficial movie-making.

Even though it’s apparently factually accurate, and while it justifiably indicts the dishonesty and hypocrisy pervasive in the stock broker profession, to sit through three sensationalized hours of all this debauchery is just too much.

Share.

About Author

At the Movies

Comments are closed.